Implementation of multiqc report generation for the V1 report

[Mxrcon]

👋 Hey there, updating what we discussed on #99 regardging the V1 report, I came here to share the first successful run for the V1 accommodating QC report from all samples and a heatmap from the SNP distances.

I'd like to hear your opinion about those changes and how it can be improved for better user experience.

Here s an attachment with the report generated by the pipeline.

The overall changes resume on two steps:

1. Organize channels for file imporation by multiqc
2. Add multiqc config file

Kindly,
Davi

[abhi18av]

Hi @Mxrcon , I tried to test it locally and it fails with the following message

[Mxrcon]

Hi @Mxrcon , I tried to test it locally and it fails with the following message

Sorry @abhi18av, rookie mistake i forgot to push the config yaml

[abhi18av]

Thanks for the quickfix @Mxrcon - it is starting to look good.

I have 2 suggestions overall within the scope of multiqc-v1

1. Allow the multiqc report to be generated even with skip_merge_analysis option enabled for the use-cases where the users might only want to do quick QC on the sequences.

2. Add a python-script to massage the data being staged into the multiqc process, please look at the comments in the screenshot below

[abhi18av]

@Mxrcon , whenever you have the time, we should take this up again.

Especially, with two possibilities of

1. Summarizing only the results of QUALITY_CHECK_WF
2. And full results of the pipeline