Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Windows.Applications.Edge.History2023.yaml #709

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AdrianX21
Copy link
Contributor

Good morning, I have detected that the plugin to review Edge's history was not working correctly, as it was not displaying all the fields. I have modified the query to display all the consulted URLs by selecting the URL field within the history file. In my case, I use it for my own phishing process, and this makes it much easier.
image

Good morning, I have detected that the plugin to review Edge's history was not working correctly, as it was not displaying all the fields. I have modified the query to display all the consulted URLs by selecting the URL field within the history file. In my case, I use it for my own phishing process, and this makes it much easier.
@scudette
Copy link
Collaborator

Those specific sqlite based artifacts are getting phased out in favour of the sqlitehunter artifact.

Would you like to make the changes there?

@AdrianX21
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello, I have tested it, but in this case, that plugin better suits our company's needs. We have implemented an automated workflow focused on phishing (in the near future, we will implement a V2, which will be an evolved virtual SOC that automatically generates a ticket and self-analyzes as if it were a level 1 technician).

The operation is as follows: When a user reports an email as suspicious, it is analyzed with an in-house tool, and when it is determined to be malicious, a query is made on our corporate browsers, and that's when we call the plugin I shared.

I can program in the new version, but for now, what I mentioned aligns more optimally with our company's needs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants