-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Relevance Assessment
Christian Dullweber edited this page Feb 26, 2014
·
9 revisions
Draft To determine the performance of our EntitySuggester it is crucial to determine the relevance of the suggestions and based on that make further investigations on recall/precision. Relevance is a very subjective topic, which can lead to different answers depending on who to ask for evaluation.
- ask many people to reduce subjectivity
- sample size?
- difference user relevance and topical relevance relevance feedback query transformation -binary relevance: relevant or not-relevant? Bayes Decision or graded relevance
- For a given entity the EntitySuggestor shows suggestions
- the user evaluates the given output into relevant or not-relevant
- use of probailistic model or vector space model? step 2: if probabilistic: calculate new probabilities
- output changed query
- user can evaluate changed results
Step2 hard to implement.
Blind Relevance Feedback? (Pseudo Relevance Feedback)
- assumption relevance is binary
- classify suggestion S as relevant(R) or non-relevant (NR)
- put suggestion in class which has the highest probability
- S is relevant if: P(R|S)> P(NR|S) Bayes Decision Rule (conditional probability)
- how to calculate P(S|R)?
- Bayes Rule: P(R|S) = P(S|R) P(R) / P(S)
naive: just evaluationg binary relevance of suggestions for a given entity