⚗️ experimenting with jwt authentication #38
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hgwood
added a commit
to Zenika/rtt
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2024
En vue d'éventuellement interroger Alibeez via API. Voir aussi Zenika/proxybeez#38.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Expérimentation pour voir ce qu'on pourrait faire avec une authentification JWT. En théorie, cela permettrait d'interroger proxybeez depuis un front-end afin de récuprer des données concernant l'utilisateur connecté à ce front-end, sans que ce front-end connaisse de clé secrète.