Revert incorrect typing changes

[Dreamsorcerer]

From #9528. This should work again with mypy 1.14.

Add some new flags too.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.77%. Comparing base (f52ec5c) to head (6eed0f0).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10222      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.77%   98.77%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         122      122              
  Lines       37029    37028       -1     
  Branches     2041     2041              
==========================================
- Hits        36577    36573       -4     
- Misses        313      316       +3     
  Partials      139      139              

Flag	Coverage Δ
CI-GHA	98.66% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
OS-Linux	98.34% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
OS-Windows	96.21% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
OS-macOS	97.46% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.10.11	97.34% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.10.15	97.92% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.11.11	98.01% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
Py-3.11.9	97.43% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.12.8	98.43% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.13.1	98.42% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.9.13	97.23% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.9.20	97.80% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-pypy7.3.16	97.38% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
VM-macos	97.46% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
VM-ubuntu	98.34% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
VM-windows	96.21% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #10222 will not alter performance

_{Comparing Dreamsorcerer-patch-1 (6eed0f0) with master (f52ec5c)}

Summary

✅ 47 untouched benchmarks

[Dreamsorcerer]

Pending dependabot PR, which should catch up over the next 2 days.

[webknjaz]

Pending dependabot PR, which should catch up over the next 2 days.

@Dreamsorcerer alternatively we could just bump all the deps manually, with a local pip-tools run. And avoid those annoying Dependabot notifications coming in every day..

[asvetlov]

Sorry, guys, I've missed what are you talking about.
@webknjaz do you want to disable dependabot for the project?

[Dreamsorcerer]

Pending dependabot PR, which should catch up over the next 2 days.

@Dreamsorcerer alternatively we could just bump all the deps manually, with a local pip-tools run. And avoid those annoying Dependabot notifications coming in every day..

I'm just being lazy. Could have also manually triggered Dependabot. I think using Dependabot is still preferable, but would be great to filter out those notifications...

[webknjaz]

do you want to disable dependabot for the project?

No, not right now anyway. The problem is that it was stuck for a while, and Sam fixed it just the other day. Now it's trying to catch up by creating a gazillion of PRs, one per each dependency. It calls pip-compile under the hood. A more efficient way could be running it manually to bump everything just this once, so dependabot would be less noisy.

The current setup is not very flexible and has a number of issues in the space of package management, so it's possible to fundamentally rework it, but it requires a certain amount of focused effort. This is why I'm not jumping right into it, even though I've done this research multiple times elsewhere and have really good practices that work.