Remove references to objc_provider and remove force_load_direct_deps to support rules_apple > 3.15.0

[ssarad]

1. With rules_apple removing legacy objc_providers, rules_apple > 3.15.0 is no longer compatible with rules_ios due to Remove legacy Objc provider linking support bazelbuild/rules_apple#2611

2. Removing force load direct deps as its no longer needed in Bazel 7 Consider removing force_load_direct_deps_rule in Bazel 7+ #862

ERROR: /Users/ssarad/Bazel/BUILD.bazel:3:15: in apple_framework_packaging rule 
Traceback (most recent call last):
	File "/Users/ssarad/.bazel_cache/output/external/rules_ios~/rules/framework.bzl", line 1109, column 48, in _apple_framework_packaging_impl
		bundle_outs = _bundle_dynamic_framework(ctx, is_extension_safe = is_extension_safe, avoid_deps = avoid_deps)
	File "/Users/ssarad/.bazel_cache/output/external/rules_ios~/rules/framework.bzl", line 888, column 44, in _bundle_dynamic_framework
		partials.framework_provider_partial(
	File "/Users/ssarad/.bazel_cache/output/external/rules_apple~/apple/internal/partials/framework_provider.bzl", line 94, column 5, in framework_provider_partial
		def framework_provider_partial(
Error: framework_provider_partial() got unexpected keyword argument: objc_provider

This PR is attempt to make rules_ios compatible with rules_apple + remove the legacy code to force load direct deps as with Bazel 7, --incompatible_objc_alwayslink_by_default does the same thing.

[ssarad]

@luispadron If I can get your review that'd be fantastic 🙏

[ssarad]

Added this line because CI was complaining about this (do let me know if this isnt right)

[luispadron]

Thanks for getting the work started here! I think theres some left-over usage:

Error: <target //tests/ios/in-tree-vendor-prebuilt-deps/Pods/MiSnap:MiSnap-MiSnap.framework-import> (rule 'apple_dynamic_framework_import') doesn't contain declared provider 'objc'

Do we need to upgrade rules_apple in MODULE.bazel, if so, we'll need to drop Bazel 6 support (probably in it's own PR).

[ssarad]

Thanks for getting the work started here! I think theres some left-over usage:

Error: <target //tests/ios/in-tree-vendor-prebuilt-deps/Pods/MiSnap:MiSnap-MiSnap.framework-import> (rule 'apple_dynamic_framework_import') doesn't contain declared provider 'objc'

Do we need to upgrade rules_apple in MODULE.bazel, if so, we'll need to drop Bazel 6 support (probably in it's own PR).

@luispadron I think when I didnt change rules_apple to 3.15.0, I got build errors that rules_apple was expecting the objc_provider parameter.

I would vote to drop Bazel 6 support mainly because

1. Your recent survey showed that most of us are on Bazel 7
2. rules_apple has dropped support for Bazel 6

What do you think? If you’d think its fine to drop support for Bazel 6, I’m happy to start that PR before we let this in.

[luispadron]

Yeah I think it makes sense! @thiagohmcruz @gyfelton FYI in case we have some reason for keeping Bazel 6

[ssarad]

Yeah I think it makes sense! @thiagohmcruz @gyfelton FYI in case we have some reason for keeping Bazel 6

Okay perfect. I can start that PR and will tag you along. I’ll likely complete it after New Years when I am back from vacation.