Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ibridges: rename meta.yml to meta.yaml #52735

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

martin-g
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your pull request here


Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).

General instructions

  • If this PR adds or updates a recipe, use "Add" or "Update" appropriately as the first word in its title.
  • New recipes not directly relevant to the biological sciences need to be submitted to the conda-forge channel instead of Bioconda.
  • PRs require reviews prior to being merged. Once your PR is passing tests and ready to be merged, please issue the @BiocondaBot please add label command.
  • Please post questions on Gitter or ping @bioconda/core in a comment.

Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues

Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify run_exports (see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).
Add a run_exports section like this:

build:
  run_exports:
    - ...

with ... being one of:

Case run_exports statement
semantic versioning {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}
semantic versioning (0.x.x) {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}
known breakage in minor versions {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }} (in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that)
known breakage in patch versions {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }} (in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that)
calendar versioning {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}

while replacing "myrecipe" with either name if a name|lower variable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.

Bot commands for PR management

Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:

Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:

@BiocondaBot please update Merge the master branch into a PR.
@BiocondaBot please add label Add the please review & merge label.
@BiocondaBot please fetch artifacts Post links to CI-built packages/containers.
You can use this to test packages locally.

Note that the @BiocondaBot please merge command is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.

Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include @bioconda/<team> and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed <team>.

@martin-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

@BiocondaBot please fetch artifacts

@BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Package(s) built are ready for inspection:

Arch Package Zip File / Repodata CI Instructions
noarch ibridges-1.2.0-pyhdfd78af_1.tar.bz2 noarch.zip GitHub Actions
showYou may also use conda to install after downloading and extracting the zip file. conda install -c ./packages <package name>

Docker image(s) built:

Package Tag CI Install with docker
ibridges 1.2.0--pyhdfd78af_1 GitHub Actions
showImages are in the linux-64 zip file above.gzip -dc images/ibridges---1.2.0--pyhdfd78af_1.tar.gz | docker load

@martin-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

I wonder how https://anaconda.org/bioconda/ibridges/files was built without meta.yAml ?!

@martin-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

@BiocondaBot please add label

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added the please review & merge set to ask for merge label Dec 11, 2024
@aliciaaevans
Copy link
Contributor

I wonder how https://anaconda.org/bioconda/ibridges/files was built without meta.yAml ?!

I guess it was breaking the bulk build, so @daler renamed it on bulk and it got uploaded from that: 9c54e94

@aliciaaevans
Copy link
Contributor

If we merge this now, it might cause a conflict when we merge bulk back to master. Is it causing problems or can it wait since the package exists in the channel already? I don't have a problem merging it now if it's needed but if we can hold off it might make things a little bit easier later.

@martin-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think it can wait.
I noticed it in the build logs of another recipe ...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
please review & merge set to ask for merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants