Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CROM-6919 Optional retry with more memory for all standard backends. #6909

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: ks_standard_mem_env
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kshakir
Copy link
Contributor

@kshakir kshakir commented Sep 18, 2022

No description provided.

@kshakir
Copy link
Contributor Author

kshakir commented Sep 18, 2022

This memory-related PR enhances #6766. The former addresses portable command <<< … >>> blocks (across Cromwell backends) and this PR enables portable more-memory functionality.

The prior "Side note" still applies. Instead of changing the existing Papi tests to run on all backends this PR adds (mostly copy/pasted) TES tests. This is because:

  1. As noted the memory runtime attribute isn't currently supported by the Local backend, and
  2. Other backends like AWSBATCH are mostly disabled in CI.

@kshakir kshakir force-pushed the ks_standard_mem_retry branch from cf0b421 to 5b53820 Compare May 9, 2023 15:35
@kshakir kshakir requested a review from a team as a code owner May 9, 2023 15:35
@kshakir kshakir force-pushed the ks_standard_mem_retry branch from 5b53820 to 0da566c Compare May 9, 2023 19:05
@kshakir kshakir force-pushed the ks_standard_mem_env branch from b9fc1c3 to 61063cb Compare May 11, 2024 01:05
@kshakir kshakir changed the title Optional retry with more memory for all standard backends. CROM-6919 Optional retry with more memory for all standard backends. May 11, 2024
@kshakir kshakir marked this pull request as draft May 11, 2024 01:11
@kshakir kshakir force-pushed the ks_standard_mem_retry branch from 0da566c to 4862544 Compare May 11, 2024 02:07
@kshakir kshakir force-pushed the ks_standard_mem_retry branch from 4862544 to 0477642 Compare May 11, 2024 03:01
@kshakir kshakir marked this pull request as ready for review May 11, 2024 06:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant