-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Listserv edits #80
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Listserv edits #80
Conversation
removed references to non-existent repository
Corrections by Francis
norms.md
Outdated
|
||
3. If your response is tangential to the main point of the thread, consider replying with a different Subject line. The old Usenet convention of **[New Subject] (was: [old subject])** can be your friend. As an example: "Why python is better than Ruby On Rails for ArchivesSpace (was: Help with an ArchivesSpace problem)" | ||
|
||
4. **Be kind, take 2.** Just about everyone who participates on the Code4Lib listserv is committed to building this cooperative community. If you feel "slapped" by something, feel that there are microagressions happening, etc., first re-read the post to make sure there isn't another way of reading it. If you still need to respond, please do it in a way that addresses the behavior, not the person posting. Just as is recommended for initial handling of [Conflict Resolution](<https://github.com/code4lib/code-of-conduct/blob/master/code_of_conduct.md#conflict-resolution>) at Code4Lib, perhaps a private email asking for clarification first would help resolve things. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think "microagressions" should be "microaggressions"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
*thanks!
:-)
@bobbi-SMR Is this worth updating and trying to get merged, or not so much? |
Note there are two conflicts that will need to be resolved, as well. Happy to help with this if you want to go forward with this PR. |
This is an update of the code of conduct to include discussion of the Listserv and behavior related to it.
It has been vetted by several members of the Community Support Squad.