Client-Side State Management for seamless user interactions #138
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates across various components of the project introduce enhancements and new features focused on state management, event handling, and component rendering. Specifically, these changes refine the way files and extensions are ignored, improve state setting and hook creation mechanisms, ensure deterministic naming for rendered components, and augment event formatting capabilities. Collectively, these modifications aim to streamline development workflows and bolster the application's functionality. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pyproject.tomlis excluded by:!**/*.toml
Files selected for processing (5)
- app-examples/gallery/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- nextpy/backend/vars.py (1 hunks)
- nextpy/frontend/components/component.py (1 hunks)
- nextpy/frontend/templates/jinja/web/pages/base_page.js.jinja2 (1 hunks)
- nextpy/utils/format.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- app-examples/gallery/.gitignore
- nextpy/frontend/templates/jinja/web/pages/base_page.js.jinja2
Additional comments: 3
nextpy/utils/format.py (1)
- 349-376: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-349]
The rest of the
format.pyfile, outside the modifiedformat_propfunction, remains unchanged and appears to be consistent with the file's purpose of providing various formatting utilities for the application. No additional issues or concerns are identified in these sections.The unmodified sections of the file are consistent with the application's formatting needs and do not introduce new issues.
nextpy/frontend/components/component.py (1)
- 1593-1594: The addition of a closing brace
}directly to therendered_chainstring at line 1593 is a straightforward approach to ensure the JavaScript code block is correctly closed. However, this method might introduce risks ifrendered_chaindoes not always represent a block of code that requires a closing brace or if additional context is needed to determine the correct placement of the closing brace. Consider verifying the consistency and correctness of this approach across different use cases.nextpy/backend/vars.py (1)
- 1476-1477: The addition of
DispatchContextin thehooksdictionary uses a semicolon;at the end of the line within the string. This is consistent with JavaScript syntax but ensure that all JavaScript code executed in this context adheres to this syntax standard for consistency.
| if isinstance(rendered_chain, str): | ||
| rendered_chain = rendered_chain.strip("{}") | ||
|
|
||
| rendered_chain = rendered_chain+'}' | ||
|
|
||
| # Hash the rendered EventChain to get a deterministic function name. | ||
| chain_hash = md5(str(rendered_chain).encode("utf-8")).hexdigest() | ||
| memo_name = f"{event_trigger}_{chain_hash}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-1594]
The file introduces a comprehensive framework for defining and rendering components in a Next.js application, leveraging React and custom logic for state management, event handling, and dynamic rendering. The implementation of StatefulComponent and its memoization strategy is particularly noteworthy, aiming to optimize re-renders and improve performance. However, ensure that the memoization logic correctly handles all edge cases, especially concerning dynamic content and event handlers, to prevent stale renders or incorrect behavior. Additionally, the extensive use of dynamic typing and reflection could impact maintainability and type safety; consider leveraging TypeScript or more explicit type annotations for critical paths in the codebase.
| event = f"addEvents([{chain}], {arg_def}, {json_dumps(prop.event_actions)})" | ||
| prop = f"{arg_def} => {event}" | ||
|
|
||
| if isinstance(event, str): | ||
| event = event.strip("{}") | ||
|
|
||
| parts = chain.split('.') | ||
| formatted_chain = f'{parts[0]} . {parts[1]}.{parts[2]}' | ||
|
|
||
| # Extract "_e0.target.value" | ||
| value_match = re.search(r"value:([^,)}]+)", event) | ||
| if value_match: | ||
| value = value_match.group(1) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| # Extract "state.state" | ||
| message_match = re.search(r"addEvents\(\[\S+?\(\"([^.]+?\.[^.]+)", event) | ||
| if message_match: | ||
| message = message_match.group(1) | ||
|
|
||
| dispatcher_line = f"const dispatcher = dispatchers['{message}'];\n" \ | ||
| f"dispatcher({{ message: {value} }});" | ||
|
|
||
| prop = f"{arg_def} =>{{ {dispatcher_line}\n{event} }}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The implementation of event handling within the format_prop function introduces several issues and areas for improvement:
- Complexity: The function has become significantly more complex with the addition of event handling logic. Consider refactoring to improve readability and maintainability.
- Hardcoded Values: The construction of
formatted_chain(line 357) seems to assume a specific structure forchain. This might not be robust against different event structures. - Regex Usage: The use of regex to extract values (lines 360-362 and 366-368) could be error-prone and might not work as expected for all possible event formats.
- Dispatcher Line Construction: The construction of
dispatcher_line(lines 370-371) directly within the function increases its responsibilities beyond formatting props. Consider separating event dispatching logic into a dedicated function or module.
Consider refactoring the event handling logic to address these concerns, potentially by separating concerns and simplifying the implementation.
| @@ -1590,6 +1590,8 @@ def _get_memoized_event_triggers( | |||
| if isinstance(rendered_chain, str): | |||
| rendered_chain = rendered_chain.strip("{}") | |||
|
|
|||
| rendered_chain = rendered_chain+'}' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why is this change made? Isn't rendered_chain working correctly previously?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've noticed an issue with the original rendered_chain definition in the component.py file. The initial code is as follows:
{(_e0) =>{
const dispatcher = dispatchers['state.state'];
dispatcher({ message: _e0.target.value });
addEvents([Event("state.state.set_message", {value:_e0.target.value})], _e0, {})
}}
However, there seems to be a processing step that alters rendered_chain by removing the opening and closing curly brackets {}. This modification necessitates manually appending an additional closing curly bracket } at the end of the rendered_chain to ensure correct rendering in the index.js file. The modified code looks like this:
_e0 => {
const dispatcher = dispatchers['state.state']
dispatcher({ message: _e0.target.value })
addEvents([Event('state.state.set_message', { value: _e0.target.value })], _e0, {})
},
This workaround fixes the rendering issue.
| @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Purpose: | |||
| {# ============================== | |||
| LIBRARY IMPORTS BLOCK | |||
| ============================== #} | |||
| import { DispatchContext } from 'utils/context' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Instead of doing it here, we should move this to default imports which are being used by the jinja template from utils.py file (most probably)
| if isinstance(event, str): | ||
| event = event.strip("{}") | ||
|
|
||
| parts = chain.split('.') | ||
| formatted_chain = f'{parts[0]} . {parts[1]}.{parts[2]}' | ||
|
|
||
| # Extract "_e0.target.value" | ||
| value_match = re.search(r"value:([^,)}]+)", event) | ||
| if value_match: | ||
| value = value_match.group(1) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| # Extract "state.state" | ||
| message_match = re.search(r"addEvents\(\[\S+?\(\"([^.]+?\.[^.]+)", event) | ||
| if message_match: | ||
| message = message_match.group(1) | ||
|
|
||
| dispatcher_line = f"const dispatcher = dispatchers['{message}'];\n" \ | ||
| f"dispatcher({{ message: {value} }});" | ||
|
|
||
| prop = f"{arg_def} =>{{ {dispatcher_line}\n{event} }}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you add example as comment for each part which details the input and output from the executed code?
| # Extract "_e0.target.value" | ||
| value_match = re.search(r"value:([^,)}]+)", event) | ||
| if value_match: | ||
| value = value_match.group(1) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would .group(1) call always return something?
anubrag
changed the title
This pull request introduces significant improvements to state management, event parsing, and frontend context handling, along with refactoring and code hygiene enhancements.
Key Changes:
New Features:
Refactor:
Chores:
.webfiles for cleaner repository management.Specific Changes:
DispatchContextimports toindex.jsfor optimized loading.