feat: Add approval mechanism for Twitter posts via Discord bot #1876
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Relates to
Risks
Low Risk- Works only If enabled
Background
What does this PR do?
This PR introduces a new feature in the Twitter client that implements an approval workflow before publishing tweets on Twitter. This feature is particularly useful for organizations using Eliza to manage their Twitter accounts, as it provides an additional layer of control by requiring approval before any content goes live.
What kind of change is this?
Features (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
Why are we doing this? Any context or related work?
The approval mechanism is being introduced to address the needs of organizations and teams that require greater control over the content being published via their Twitter accounts. By adding this feature, we enable a structured review process to ensure that tweets align with brand guidelines, organizational policies, and quality standards before they are made public.
Context or Related Work
This enhancement aligns with the broader goal of making Eliza a versatile and enterprise-friendly platform for managing social media channels effectively.
Documentation changes needed?
Testing
Where should a reviewer start?
Detailed testing steps
Screenshots
Before
After
-->