Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat #246 - Provider function to query for UTxOs at an address with an asset #247

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 5, 2023

Conversation

sourabhxyz
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@sourabhxyz sourabhxyz marked this pull request as ready for review October 25, 2023 17:12
@sourabhxyz sourabhxyz requested a review from a team as a code owner October 25, 2023 17:12
Copy link
Contributor

@Micrograx Micrograx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed during the standup, maybe we could leave utxosAtAddress the way it was, and add a new endpoint like utxosAtAddressWithAsset that has the extra Maybe GYAssetClass parameter. Normal utxosAtAddress could just call utxosAtAddressWithAsset with a default Nothing value for asset.

But this current solution doesn't bother me much as well. Up to you if you want to update it or merge it as is.

@sourabhxyz
Copy link
Member Author

@Micrograx I was thinking to implement this suggestion but seeing that we are already using commit of this PR and that there is a overhaul of types (so that there are no thunks) coming, I am inclined to merging it as it is.

@sourabhxyz sourabhxyz merged commit 58a30a5 into main Nov 5, 2023
2 checks passed
@sourabhxyz sourabhxyz deleted the 246-utxos-with-asset branch November 5, 2023 11:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants