Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🧹 chore: Improve Performance of Fiber Router #3261

Draft
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gaby
Copy link
Member

@gaby gaby commented Dec 21, 2024

Description

  • Micro performance improvements for the Fiber Router.

Improvements to RemoveEscapeChar()

After:

ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop/git/fiber$ go test -benchmem -run=^$ -bench ^Benchmark_Utils_RemoveEscapeChar$ github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3 -count=4
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3
cpu: AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor           
Benchmark_Utils_RemoveEscapeChar-4   	48737022	        21.87 ns/op	      16 B/op	       1 allocs/op
Benchmark_Utils_RemoveEscapeChar-4   	51360970	        21.88 ns/op	      16 B/op	       1 allocs/op
Benchmark_Utils_RemoveEscapeChar-4   	53682570	        21.97 ns/op	      16 B/op	       1 allocs/op
Benchmark_Utils_RemoveEscapeChar-4   	45811604	        21.91 ns/op	      16 B/op	       1 allocs/op
PASS
ok  	github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3	4.494s

Before:

ubuntu@ubuntu:~/Desktop/git/fiber$ go test -benchmem -run=^$ -bench ^Benchmark_Utils_RemoveEscapeChar$ github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3 -count=4
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3
cpu: AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 8-Core Processor           
Benchmark_Utils_RemoveEscapeChar-4   	34108017	        33.72 ns/op	      16 B/op	       1 allocs/op
Benchmark_Utils_RemoveEscapeChar-4   	31172214	        33.48 ns/op	      16 B/op	       1 allocs/op
Benchmark_Utils_RemoveEscapeChar-4   	34733971	        33.61 ns/op	      16 B/op	       1 allocs/op
Benchmark_Utils_RemoveEscapeChar-4   	34788264	        33.87 ns/op	      16 B/op	       1 allocs/op
PASS
ok  	github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3	4.707s

Router Improvements

TBD (Coming soon)

Type of change

  • Performance improvement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 21, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 21, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.87097% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.28%. Comparing base (57744eb) to head (8e213e0).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
router.go 87.14% 5 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
app.go 57.14% 3 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3261      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.40%   84.28%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files         116      116              
  Lines       11485    11507      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits         9694     9699       +5     
- Misses       1374     1385      +11     
- Partials      417      423       +6     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 84.28% <83.87%> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -620,10 +620,16 @@ func GetTrimmedParam(param string) string {

// RemoveEscapeChar remove escape characters
func RemoveEscapeChar(word string) string {
if strings.IndexByte(word, escapeChar) != -1 {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change alone saves 12ns/op

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.

Benchmark suite Current: 8e213e0 Previous: 57744eb Ratio
`Benchmark_RoutePatternMatch//api/:param/fixedEnd_ not_match _/api/abc/def/fixedEnd - allocs/op` 14 allocs/op
Benchmark_Compress_Levels/Brotli_LevelBestCompression - B/op 5 B/op 0 B/op +∞
BenchmarkUnmarshalitem-4_middleware_limiter 40.74 ns/op 638.25 MB/s 0 B/op 0 allocs/op 26.61 ns/op 977.07 MB/s 0 B/op 0 allocs/op 1.53
BenchmarkUnmarshalitem-4_middleware_limiter - ns/op 40.74 ns/op 26.61 ns/op 1.53

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@gaby
Copy link
Member Author

gaby commented Dec 26, 2024

main branch vs this branch

image

@gaby
Copy link
Member Author

gaby commented Dec 28, 2024

@ReneWerner87 @efectn v2 vs main vs this branch

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant