Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize VisitorState#getConstantExpression #4586

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Stephan202
Copy link
Contributor

By avoiding a second pass over the string.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Stephan202 Stephan202 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I filed this PR as a result of work in PicnicSupermarket/error-prone-support#1138, where I found out that I overlooked VisitorState#getConstantExpression and instead reinvented the wheel.

} else {
sb.append(c);
}
if (!(value instanceof CharSequence str)) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a second commit that enables a further optimization by accepting any CharSequence; this can be backed out if desired.

if (c == '\'') {
sb.append('\'');
} else {
sb.append(Convert.quote(c));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Incidentally I recently learned that Convert.quote does the thing we'd want now, but only for JDK 23+: openjdk/jdk@144a08e

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Er, and as a result of that change Convert.quote(char) was replaced with Convert.quote(char, boolean), so this change doesn't work with the latest JDK EA builds.

I'm not sure what the best option is. We could use reflection or MR-JARs to call the method.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, nice catch! I haven't looked at the MR-JAR setup yet, but indeed reflection should work. TBD whether I'll find some time today for a new pass.

} else {
sb.append(c);
}
if (!(value instanceof CharSequence str)) {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately we're not quite ready to start using Java > 11 features in non-test code internally. I can remove the instanceof pattern when importing this, I'm just leaving a note here in case you wonder why it disappears.

Copy link
Collaborator

@cushon cushon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Convert.quote part will need more work to be compatible with the latest JDK EA builds

copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2024
By avoiding a second pass over the string.

Fixes #4586

FUTURE_COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=#4586 from PicnicSupermarket:sschroevers/optimize-getConstantExpression ff02145
PiperOrigin-RevId: 677291745
copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2024
By avoiding a second pass over the string.

Fixes #4586

FUTURE_COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=#4586 from PicnicSupermarket:sschroevers/optimize-getConstantExpression ff02145
PiperOrigin-RevId: 677291745
copybara-service bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2024
By avoiding a second pass over the string.

Fixes #4586

FUTURE_COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=#4586 from PicnicSupermarket:sschroevers/optimize-getConstantExpression ff02145
PiperOrigin-RevId: 677291745
@Stephan202 Stephan202 force-pushed the sschroevers/optimize-getConstantExpression branch from ff02145 to 45f3401 Compare December 28, 2024 22:28
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Stephan202 Stephan202 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rebased and added a commit with a multi-release JAR approach. Locally this makes the build pass with JDK 25.ea.3-open.

I suspect that changes to .github/workflows/ci.yml are required, but as the GitHub Actions workflow isn't auto-triggered, I'm not sure 👀.

I'll cross-reference this PR in #3756.

Comment on lines +184 to +199
<execution>
<id>java23</id>
<goals>
<goal>compile</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<jdkToolchain>
<version>23</version>
</jdkToolchain>
<compileSourceRoots>
<compileSourceRoot>${basedir}/src/main/java23</compileSourceRoot>
</compileSourceRoots>
<!-- multiReleaseOutput requires setting release -->
<outputDirectory>${project.build.outputDirectory}/META-INF/versions/23</outputDirectory>
</configuration>
</execution>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few things are of note here:

  • Without <goal>compile</goal> this execution is skipped. This also means that the java24 execution below is currently a no-op.
  • This configuration doesn't override the inherited <source>17</source> and <target>17</target> settings, though it could. (If so, we should do the same below.)
  • I'm not sure each of these executions should use an exactly-matching toolchain JDK version. Perhaps it's better to use the latest JDK whenever possible, so as to minimize the number of JDKs required.

Comment on lines +216 to +226
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<archive>
<manifestEntries>
<Multi-Release>true</Multi-Release>
</manifestEntries>
</archive>
</configuration>
</plugin>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also had to add this to make sure that the class file bundled under META-INF/versions/23 is picked up.

Comment on lines +21 to +25
/**
* @see VisitorState#getConstantExpression(Object)
*/
final class ConstantStringExpressions {
private ConstantStringExpressions() {}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Certainly open to approaches other than a special-purpose static utility class named com.google.errorprone.ConstantStringExpressions.

}

// Don't escape single-quotes in string literals.
CharSequence str = (CharSequence) value;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dropped the instanceof pattern matching as suggested here.

return state
.getElements()
.getConstantExpression(
value instanceof CharSequence charSequence ? charSequence.toString() : value);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here I did keep the instanceof pattern matching, because this code anyway only applies to JDK 23+, but if that anyway impacts the Google-internal setup, that can be changed, of course.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants