Support for MBWay #4
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new optional Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/examples/app_v2.py (2)
78-78: Consider phone validation or sanitization.Currently, the
phoneparameter is being read directly from user input. If phone numbers need a specific format or length, consider validating or sanitizing this value.
81-81: Ensure consistent treatment of customer fields.
customeris set toNonewhenphoneis missing. If additional customer details are introduced later, confirm that all fields are handled in a consistent manner to avoid partial or inconsistent data.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/easypay/payment.py(2 hunks)src/examples/app_v2.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
src/easypay/payment.py
57-57: Use customer != None instead of not customer == None
Replace with != operator
(SIM201)
57-57: Comparison to None should be cond is None
Replace with cond is None
(E711)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/examples/app_v2.py (1)
83-88: Gracefully handle errors from generate_payment.
Calls to self.api.generate_payment can fail or raise exceptions. Consider adding error-handling logic, such as try-except blocks or user notifications, to gracefully handle potential failures (e.g. network issues, invalid inputs, or server errors).
src/easypay/payment.py (1)
37-44: Good clarity with the optional customer parameter.
The additional parameter customer=None makes the function more flexible. Confirm that all callers provide or omit this parameter consistently.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/easypay/payment.py (1)
Line range hint
37-75: Consider adding MBWay-specific validation.The current implementation handles customer data generically. Consider adding:
- Validation for MBWay-specific customer fields (e.g., phone number format)
- Documentation about required customer fields for MBWay
- Type hints or data class for the customer dictionary structure
This would help prevent runtime errors and improve the developer experience.
Would you like me to propose a data class structure for the customer data with MBWay-specific validation?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
59-59: Use
customer != Noneinstead ofnot customer == NoneReplace with
!=operator(SIM201)
59-59: Comparison to
Noneshould becond is NoneReplace with
cond is None(E711)
73-73: Use
customer != Noneinstead ofnot customer == NoneReplace with
!=operator(SIM201)
73-73: Comparison to
Noneshould becond is NoneReplace with
cond is None(E711)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/easypay/payment.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
src/easypay/payment.py
59-59: Use customer != None instead of not customer == None
Replace with != operator
(SIM201)
59-59: Comparison to None should be cond is None
Replace with cond is None
(E711)
73-73: Use customer != None instead of not customer == None
Replace with != operator
(SIM201)
73-73: Comparison to None should be cond is None
Replace with cond is None
(E711)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/easypay/payment.py (4)
37-45: LGTM! Method signature updated appropriately.
The addition of the optional customer parameter with a default value of None maintains backward compatibility while enabling MBWay support.
59-60: Use Pythonic is not None check.
Instead of if not customer == None:, prefer using if customer is not None:. This is more idiomatic in Python and improves readability.
- if not customer == None:
+ if customer is not None:🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
59-59: Use customer != None instead of not customer == None
Replace with != operator
(SIM201)
59-59: Comparison to None should be cond is None
Replace with cond is None
(E711)
68-70: LGTM! Method signature updated consistently.
The customer parameter addition maintains the same default behavior as in generate_payment.
72-74: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve None comparison and verify MBWay requirements.
- Use Python's idiomatic
is not Nonecheck:
- if not customer == None:
+ if customer is not None:- Let's verify that the customer data structure meets MBWay's requirements.
✅ Verification successful
Fix None comparison and use optional customer data structure
The code review reveals:
- The customer parameter is correctly handled as an optional field in the payment data structure.
- From the example usage in
app_v2.py, we can see that customer data is a simple dictionary with a 'phone' field when provided. - The None comparison should indeed be improved for better Python idioms.
Suggested changes:
- if not customer == None:
+ if customer is not None:No specific MBWay requirements were found in the codebase for customer data structure. The current implementation appears flexible, accepting an optional customer dictionary that can contain relevant fields like 'phone' as shown in the example.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for MBWay-specific documentation or examples in the codebase
rg -l -g '!*.pyc' -g '!*.git*' -i 'mbway|mb way' .
# Look for customer data structure validation
ast-grep --pattern 'customer = {$$$}'
Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find MBWay-related code and customer validation
# Search for payment method constants or enums
rg -i "mbway|mb.?way" -A 3 -B 3
# Search for customer validation or type hints
ast-grep --pattern 'def create_payment($$$customer$$$)'
# Look for any customer-related validation or type definitions
rg "customer" -A 2 -B 2 --type py
Length of output: 2183
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
73-73: Use customer != None instead of not customer == None
Replace with != operator
(SIM201)
73-73: Comparison to None should be cond is None
Replace with cond is None
(E711)
Fixes #2
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Chores
.gitignoreto ignore files matching the patterneasypay_v2.shelve*.