-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: adjust codecov patch judge standard #2892
Conversation
变更概述演练引入了一个新的 变更
可能相关的PR
诗歌
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feat_v3.x #2892 +/- ##
=============================================
+ Coverage 85.85% 85.88% +0.03%
=============================================
Files 271 271
Lines 18393 18434 +41
Branches 2721 2727 +6
=============================================
+ Hits 15791 15832 +41
Misses 2597 2597
Partials 5 5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
codecov.yml (1)
11-11
: 建议删除多余的空行文件末尾有多个空行,建议只保留一个空行。
coverage: status: project: default: threshold: 0.5% target: 85% patch: default: target: 90% - -
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
codecov.yml
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
codecov.yml (1)
2-10
: 配置设置合理,建议验证阈值
覆盖率配置看起来合理,特别是补丁覆盖率目标(90%)高于项目整体目标(85%)的设置很好。建议验证这些阈值是否与项目的历史覆盖率趋势相符。
运行以下脚本来验证当前的代码覆盖率状态:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the coverage thresholds.
Let me try one more verification approach.
覆盖率阈值设置合理,建议继续使用
根据代码库分析,我们可以看到:
- 项目有完善的测试体系,包含大量组件级别的单元测试(超过80个测试文件)
- 使用 vitest 进行测试,并配置了覆盖率收集功能
- 设置的阈值(项目85%,补丁90%)对于一个组件库来说是合理且可达到的目标
这些阈值设置:
- 确保了新代码的高质量(补丁覆盖率90%)
- 同时给予项目整体覆盖率一定的灵活性(85%且允许0.5%的波动)
- 符合组件库这类基础库对代码质量的严格要求
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: 检查最近的覆盖率报告,确保新的阈值设置合理
# 获取最近的覆盖率报告
gh api repos/jdf2e/nutui-react/codecov/report | jq '.totals.coverage'
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any existing coverage reports in the repository
fd "coverage|codecov" --type f
# Look for any test coverage related configuration in package.json
fd "package.json" --type f --exec cat {} | jq 'select(.scripts != null) | .scripts | with_entries(select(.key | contains("coverage") or .value | contains("coverage")))'
# Check git history for any previous codecov.yml files
git log -p --all --full-history -- "*codecov*" -- "*coverage*" | head -n 50
Length of output: 827
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for test coverage configuration
cat $(fd -t f "package.json" | head -n 1)
# Look for test files to understand testing setup
fd -t f "(test|spec|__tests__)" -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx
# Check for any existing test reports
fd -t f ".(lcov|coverage)"
Length of output: 14399
🤔 这个变动的性质是?
🔗 相关 Issue
💡 需求背景和解决方案
☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单
Summary by CodeRabbit