Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Cosmos DB storage/cache option #1431

Merged
merged 130 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

Add Cosmos DB storage/cache option #1431

merged 130 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

KennyZhang1
Copy link
Contributor

@KennyZhang1 KennyZhang1 commented Nov 21, 2024

Description

This PR adds CosmosDB support for the storage and cache options.

Related Issues

N/A

Changes

  • Implemented a CosmosDBPipelineStorage class that extends the PipelineStorage base class to interface with CosmosDB
  • Modified all steps of configuration loading to accommodate the new cosmosdb option for storage and cache
  • Refactored storage and cache factory methods into factory classes
  • Modified storage and cache factory classes to enable outside users to more easily register new storage/cache implementations
  • Added integration tests using the CosmodDB emulator and updated the CI/CD pipeline accordingly

Checklist

  • I have tested these changes locally.
  • I have reviewed the code changes.
  • I have updated the documentation (if necessary).
  • I have added appropriate unit tests (if applicable).

Additional Notes

[Add any additional notes or context that may be helpful for the reviewer(s).]

KennyZhang1 and others added 30 commits November 4, 2024 14:21
@jgbradley1 jgbradley1 changed the title Add CosmosDB storage option Add Cosmos DB storage/cache option Dec 18, 2024
@AlonsoGuevara AlonsoGuevara merged commit 8368b12 into main Dec 19, 2024
15 checks passed
@AlonsoGuevara AlonsoGuevara deleted the add-cosmosdb-to-storage branch December 19, 2024 19:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants