Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Extreme X670 series #2597

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025
Merged

Conversation

aaronaxvig
Copy link
Contributor

Airflow on all of these can be either FtR or RtF so I would think shouldn't be specified in any of them. This through rack airflow is a strong indication that it should be a full-depth device, plus they come with rear support rails.

Port types were backwards on X670V-48t (should be 10gbase-t) and X670V-48x (should be SFP+) models. I guess these were just reversed accidentally.

The combo ports that were added (on the wrong switch...) should not be added as additional ports as they blocked my installation of a VIM module due to duplicate port '49'. So those are corrected as well.

@harryajc harryajc merged commit b511db8 into netbox-community:master Jan 3, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants