Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

refactor: update lock file version #135

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Mashal-m
Copy link
Contributor

@Mashal-m Mashal-m commented Aug 25, 2023

Renamed lockfileversion-check-v3 to lockfile-check in lockfile version file.

Ticket

Prototype a way to review NPM lockfiles in PRs

@feanil feanil force-pushed the mashal-m/update_lockfile branch from 01b613b to 240cd79 Compare February 8, 2024 19:11
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c9fa4d1) 58.08% compared to head (240cd79) 58.08%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #135   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   58.08%   58.08%           
=======================================
  Files          26       26           
  Lines         396      396           
  Branches       66       66           
=======================================
  Hits          230      230           
  Misses        150      150           
  Partials       16       16           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7834716778

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 55.335%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 7722354986: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 168
Relevant Lines: 306

💛 - Coveralls

@feanil feanil merged commit 8077cc2 into master Feb 8, 2024
7 checks passed
@feanil feanil deleted the mashal-m/update_lockfile branch February 8, 2024 19:19
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants