fix(metadata): set license to "MIT" (as in LICENSE file) #310
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
no idea why 'Apache 2.0' was introduced in openfoodfacts@a7c1169 but MIT seems to be correct because it's mentioned both in the README and the LICENSE file itself.
|
alexgarel
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @hf-kklein
Indeed it makes more sense to use MIT for a SDK.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
no idea why 'Apache 2.0' was introduced in a7c1169 but MIT seems to be correct because it's mentioned both in the README and the LICENSE file itself.
Solution
pyproject.tomlfile, so that they match the actual licenseRelated issue(s)