8044051: Test jdk/lambda/vm/InterfaceAccessFlagsTest.java gets IOException during compilation

[yaqsun]

Apply clean. Low risk.

---

Progress

• JDK-8044051 needs maintainer approval
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8044051: Test jdk/lambda/vm/InterfaceAccessFlagsTest.java gets IOException during compilation (Bug - P4 - Requested)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/610/head:pull/610
$ git checkout pull/610

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/610
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev.git pull/610/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 610

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 610

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/610.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back yaqsun! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue and summary from the original commit.

[openjdk]

⚠️ @yaqsun This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (279425f4)
• 00: Full (dded67cc)

[yaqsun]

/approval 8044051 request test jdk/lambda/vm/InterfaceAccessFlagsTest.java gets IOException during compilation for jdk8u

[openjdk]

@yaqsun
8044051: The approval request has been created successfully.

[bridgekeeper]

@yaqsun This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!