Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): bump bpmn-visualization to 0.43.0 #587

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 1, 2024

Conversation

@process-analytics-bot process-analytics-bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 29, 2024
@process-analytics-bot process-analytics-bot requested review from a team, tbouffard, oanesini and assynour and removed request for a team February 29, 2024 15:58
@tbouffard
Copy link
Member

tbouffard commented Feb 29, 2024

ℹ️ the rollup projects are failing, but this is not due to the changes included in this PR. This should be fixed by #589.
✔️ I tested various examples and demos and everything works fine: https://cdn.statically.io/gh/process-analytics/bpmn-visualization-examples/414df56/examples/index.html

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 1, 2024

🎊 PR Preview f9e99b9 has been successfully built and deployed to https://process-analytics-bpmn-visualization-examples-pr_preview-pr-587.surge.sh

🕐 Build time: 0.012s

🤖 By surge-preview

Copy link
Member

@tbouffard tbouffard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️ projects are now built correctly
✔️ Tested with the surge preview environment (projects)

@tbouffard tbouffard marked this pull request as ready for review March 1, 2024 09:33
@tbouffard tbouffard merged commit 7afafce into master Mar 1, 2024
17 checks passed
@tbouffard tbouffard deleted the chore/update_bpmn_visualization_to_0.43.0 branch March 1, 2024 09:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants