Translate library/math.po rst: 87-102, 239-374 #992
Conversation
Carisa-Li
force-pushed
the
library/math
branch
from
d394f84 to
ef0e053
Compare
library/math.po
Outdated
| @@ -135,6 +134,8 @@ msgid "" | |||
| "``float`` format. This operation often provides better accuracy than the " | |||
| "direct expression ``(x * y) + z``." | |||
| msgstr "" | |||
| "融合乘加運算。回傳 ``(x * y) + z``，用近似於無限精度及範圍的方式計算，而後一" | |||
| "次轉換為浮點數格式。此操作通常能提供比運算式 ``(x * y) + z`` 更高的精度。" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
這邊的 round 是四捨五入的那個 round 嗎?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
然後這邊的 precision 跟 accuracy 的翻譯可能還是要分開，精確度跟準確度應該還是不太一樣
precision 精確度
accuracy 準確度
There was a problem hiding this comment.
根據wiki對Fused multiply-add的說明，我認為此處的round含義上確實類似四捨五入
| @@ -425,6 +433,10 @@ msgid "" | |||
| "*even* integer is used for ``n``. The remainder ``r = remainder(x, y)`` " | |||
| "thus always satisfies ``abs(r) <= 0.5 * abs(y)``." | |||
| msgstr "" | |||
| "回傳 *x* 對 *y* 根據 IEEE 754 定義的餘數。對有限數 *x* 及有限非零數 *y*，該餘" | |||
| "數值為 ``x - n*y``，``n`` 是最接近 ``x / y`` 精確值的整數。若 ``x / y`` 剛好" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
我是將the exact value of the quotient x / y合翻為x / y精確值
quotient主要是擔心商可能會誤解為僅指運算結果的整數部分，這部分我會再思考一下
| @@ -425,6 +433,10 @@ msgid "" | |||
| "*even* integer is used for ``n``. The remainder ``r = remainder(x, y)`` " | |||
| "thus always satisfies ``abs(r) <= 0.5 * abs(y)``." | |||
| msgstr "" | |||
| "回傳 *x* 對 *y* 根據 IEEE 754 定義的餘數。對有限數 *x* 及有限非零數 *y*，該餘" | |||
| "數值為 ``x - n*y``，``n`` 是最接近 ``x / y`` 精確值的整數。若 ``x / y`` 剛好" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
這邊的 difference 應該不是餘數?
看起來比較接近
"這是 x - n*y 的另一種寫法" 之類的
There was a problem hiding this comment.
因為上一句定義了x,y兩數，所以我將this翻為該餘數值與第一句的根據 IEEE 754 定義的餘數對應，此處的difference我想應該是指差(減法運算的結果)，這部分我會再想一下
library/math.po
Outdated
| @@ -525,6 +553,9 @@ msgid "" | |||
| "pair of values, rather than returning their second return value through an " | |||
| "'output parameter' (there is no such thing in Python)." | |||
| msgstr "" | |||
| "請注意 :func:`frexp` 及 :func:`modf` 的呼叫/回傳模式與 C 語言中相應函式不同：" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
very nit
| "請注意 :func:`frexp` 及 :func:`modf` 的呼叫/回傳模式與 C 語言中相應函式不同：" | |
| "請注意 :func:`frexp` 及 :func:`modf` 的呼叫/回傳模式與 C 語言中的相應函式不同：" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
這部分我想了一下，覺得與C語言中相應的函式不同比較順，已修
Co-authored-by: Payon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Payon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Payon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Payon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Payon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Payon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Payon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Payon <[email protected]>
|
上游原文有更新，再請幫忙修 conflict 🙏🏽 |
No description provided.