-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Switched to RxNorm db for rxnconso #22
Conversation
# [sql_config] | ||
# file_names = [ | ||
# "define_dx.sql", | ||
# "define_dx_sepsis.sql", | ||
# "define_dx_sud.sql", | ||
# "define_lab.sql", | ||
# "define_rx.sql", | ||
# "define_rx_buprenorphine.sql", | ||
# "define_rx_naloxone.sql", | ||
# "define_rx_opioid.sql", | ||
# "table_study_period.sql", | ||
# "table_dx.sql", | ||
# "table_dx_sepsis.sql", | ||
# "table_lab.sql", | ||
# "table_rx.sql", | ||
# "version.sql" | ||
# ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i've been doing this manually each time im working and then undoing it on commit - since we now remember that the opioid study is not working in library v2.3, im inclined to leave it commented until we migrate these tables
1f4dd1b
to
f1ea960
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lol OK the one-by-one approach worked, it seems 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
on the one hand: this feels incredibly wrong
on the other hand: it's 60x faster than the 'smart' way, so 🤷
This PR does the following:
rxnorm
database directly rather than the static filen.b. after this goes in, i'm going to rebase together the last few commits to get the large files out of project history.