Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix/batch eq for scalar #1186

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 2, 2024

Conversation

dantp-ai
Copy link
Contributor

@dantp-ai dantp-ai commented Aug 2, 2024

Fixes: #1182

Note: Updated test_batch.test_slice_distribution() to use allclose (See: #1181).

assert (
Categorical(probs=sliced_probs).probs == get_sliced_dist(dist, selected_idx).probs
).all()
assert torch.allclose(sliced_batch.dist.probs, Categorical(probs=sliced_probs).probs)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thx! I guess it was failing randomly, right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@dantp-ai dantp-ai Aug 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it was sporadically returning inequality. I will take a look at getitem soon as I have an overdue task there with maintaining slicing consistency. Then I can also check what causes slicing to make these little decimal errors.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, appreciate it! I don't think the getitem issue can actually be solved, but implementing eq already solves all practical problems of it. So no need to further address it, unless you see some simple way for doing that.

The order of slicing however it's still a valid issue

@MischaPanch
Copy link
Collaborator

Thx for the PR! All looks good, merging now

@MischaPanch MischaPanch merged commit a006e7c into thu-ml:master Aug 2, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make Batch.__eq__ work also for scalar values (0-dimensional arrays)
2 participants