Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Typedarray.slice fastpath when the content type is matching #5177

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

gergocs
Copy link
Contributor

@gergocs gergocs commented Nov 25, 2024

This patch fixes #4888.

The implementation is based on PR #4898, only resolved the conflicts and
applied requested changes.

Co-authored-by: Robert Fancsik [email protected]
JerryScript-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: Gergo Csizi [email protected]

@ossy-szeged ossy-szeged added this to the Release 3.0.0 milestone Nov 25, 2024

memcpy (dst_buffer_p, src_buffer_p, count << info_p->shift);
}
else if (count >= new_typedarray_info.offset)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to be fair, there was a comment on the original PR which has not been answered yet. I paste it here.

What if count is less than the target offset? I don't think this condition is correct.

var buf = new ArrayBuffer(10);
var a1 = new Int8Array(buf, 0, 5);
a1.fill(1);
a1.constructor = {
    [Symbol.species]: function (len) {
        return new Int8Array(buf, 5, 5);
    }
};
var a2 = a1.slice(2,4);
res = new Int8Array(buf, 0, 10);

Also, I don't think checking the offset is the right way, we need to check whether the two typedarrays use the same arraybuffer instead, and only then fall back to copying element-by-element.

Originally posted by @dbatyai in #4898 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked the example and it worked just fine.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@LaszloLango LaszloLango left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@robertsipka robertsipka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have concerns about the results. The test case linked by Dániel run without an error message, but the result is correct? Sadly, as I see, no, please check it, use the mentioned test case in the PR as well, and make a results validation for res in the last line. Dániel's review seems appropriate to me.

This patch fixes jerryscript-project#4888.

The implementation is based on PR jerryscript-project#4898, only resolved the conflicts and
applied requested changes.

Co-authored-by: Robert Fancsik [email protected]
JerryScript-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: Gergo Csizi [email protected]
Copy link
Contributor

@robertsipka robertsipka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@LaszloLango LaszloLango left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

still LGTM

@LaszloLango LaszloLango merged commit ba89576 into jerryscript-project:master Nov 26, 2024
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants